0
Tinanam0102 Posted 15 years ago
Essay & Composition Writing

Bring in the big guns / of the world

Hi teachers,

Bring In the Big Guns (from last year)

Ratifying START won't be easy. It takes 67 votes in the Senate to approve treaties, which means that the Democrats need to bring along eight Republicans to win. Sen. Jon Kyl, the minority whip, is a bright guy who has apparently spent too much time with the John Boltons of the world: George W. Bush-era conservatives who oppose almost all treaties. With some concessions (which might not be acceptable to the Russians), Kyl will likely come around on the deal. But next year or the year later, he'll lead the opposition to ratifying the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban treaty, which didn't even get a majority of votes when it went to the Senate floor in 1999, much less two thirds. Unless the heads of the weapons labs (and Defense Secretary Robert Gates) say yes to the test ban, Obama can forget about that one

Can you please help me with the following? I have a lot I don't understand in the text.

1. What is "bring in the big guns"?

2. What is "of the world"?

3. What is "opposition"?

4. What is "much less two thirds" refer to?

5. Why "Obama can forget about that one", what is "one"?

Thank you.

Tinanam
  

Top answer

The text has a lot of symbolism and allegory. tinanam0102 1. What is "bring in the big guns"?

  • The text has a lot of symbolism and allegory.
  • tinanam0102 1.
  • What is "bring in the big guns"?
  • The "big guns" are the most powerful weapons that you have, but used only as a last resort.
  • It is a metaphor for the most powerful and convincing individuals who are on your side.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
The text has a lot of symbolism and allegory.
tinanam01021. What is "bring in the big guns"?
The "big guns" are the most powerful weapons that you have, but used only as a last resort. It is a metaphor for the most powerful and convincing individuals who are on your side. You don't want to use them too often, because they lose their effectiveness.
0
Hi AlpheccaStars,

Thank you for your time on this passage.

I think I am puzzled by "Unless sentence". I thought if they say yes, Obama can forget about that one. That would be logic in my mother tongue. Same trouble as "until".

1. Does it mean: Unless they say yes, (or / otherwise) Obama can forget about that one.

2. Someone owes you money, and you have a
0
Here is the sentence:

Unless the heads of the weapons labs (and Defense Secretary Robert Gates) say yes to the test ban, Obama can forget about that one.

Unless is the same as if not. So, re-write the sentence with if:

If the heads of the weapons lab say no (or - if they don't say yes)..., Obama can forget about that one.

The o
0
AlpheccaStarsThis does not make sense, because closing the file is a one-time event - it can't continue up to the point of "until."** Until you receive the money, you can close the file.
Hi AlpheccaStars,

This is how we say it in our first language, and now I am starting to understand why everyone has been saying that the structure of English sentenc
0
Hi;

It is just the logic of a sequence of events. The conjunctive adverbs relating to time sequences are before, after, when and until.

Consider this sequence in time, and we can illustrate these adverbs.

The file is open. It is waiting for the money. (Do not close the file, keep it open.)

The money arrives. You put it in the file. Now you can clo
0
Hi AlpheccaStars,

I understand now. Thank you very much.

Have a lovely day.

Tinanam

Related Questions