Hello Friends,
I get confused by This sentence:
That is, internal representations both of ‘the goal or putative end-state of an intention’ and a possible plan of action for bringing about that state.
what is the structure? can we see it as:
That is, internal representations of the goal or putative end-state of an intention
and
internal representations of a possible plan of action for bringing about that state.
and, if it is the case, we don't need of before a possible plan?
Thanks
anonymous I get confused by This sentence: It is not a sentence. id=OcfLDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT86&lpg=PT86&dq=%22the+goal+or+putative+end-state+of+an+intention%22&source=bl&ots=4vtjzPOLBz&sig=ACfU3U0ifaBD__1xgKFKYRRG8lUdzON0xw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiW5fKByt3oAhWvl-AKHaBiBaQQ6AEwAHoECAkQKA#v=onepage&q=%22the%20goal%20or%20putative%20end-state%20of%20an%20intention%22&f=false anonymous That is, internal representations of the goal or putative end-state of an intentionandinternal representations of a possible plan of action for bringing about that state. That's right.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
anonymousI get confused by This sentence:
It is not a sentence. The complete sentence I am too lazy to type from