Does the highlighted sentence want to say that 1. "these curators exhibited works that presented cod sensationalism of the scary body art voguish in some areas of the art world (an exhibition that shows their interest in such feelings)"?
or 2. "the curators in order to show their disapproval of cod sensationalism of the scary body art voguish in some areas of the art world, established this exhibition (an exhibition against such feelings)"?
Context:
The presentation of the corpse in historical collections, whether whole, dissected or in component parts, is more profoundly strange because there lingers a sense of devotional reverence we can no longer share. One suspects that Martin Kemp and Marina Wallace, curators of the Hayward Gallery’s 2000–2001 exhibition Spectacular Bodies: The Art and Science of the Human Body from Leonardo to Now, were bemused by the cod sensationalism of the scary body art voguish in some areas of the art world. Their trawl of medical museums across Europe brought to the fore a heap of glistening viscera, in paint, drawing, early photograph, wax model or actual specimen. The exhibition demonstrates how radically attitudes to the body can change.
Top answer
No, it doesn't say either. It simply says that they were bemused (ie puzzled and rather amused) by the sensationalism. Clive
— Clive
No, it doesn't say either.
It simply says that they were bemused (ie puzzled and rather amused) by the sensationalism.
Clive
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Clive, "cod sensationalism" (repeated three times in the original question) didn't strike you as strange? I was wondering if it was a typo for "cold sensationalism." Or do you think we're talking about fish art?
I think "bemused " here has a negative meaning and brings about the interpretation that these curators were so confused by the cod sensationalism of prevalent scary body art that they decided to hold an exhibition of real body art. yeah? if no, can you explain a little more about what you read between the lines?
Red apple -- you do realize that "cod sensationalism" makes no sense, don't you? You seem to be taking it as a perfectly ordinary phrase, but it's the weirdest part of the whole paragraph.
@Clive But, "one suspects that they were bemused by the cod sensationalism of the scary body art voguish in some areas of the art world" has no place in your interpretation and my main problem is with this specific sentence. I can not understand what this certain sentence want to express. Does it want to say they c