0
Peaceblinkfriend Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

"...be able to ..." with and/or without?

Hi all

Do both of these sound idiomatic? I am unsure of the second one most.

His goal is to be able to use English at a near-native level.

His goal is to use English at a near-native level.

Thank you

PBF
  

Top answer

Both are very idiomatic in Helsinki English. CB

  • Both are very idiomatic in Helsinki English.
  • CB
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
Both are very idiomatic in Helsinki English.Emotion: smile

CB
0
Thanks for your reply, CB.

Not a doubt its equally idiomatic in the rest of the English world then. Just wondering. Is there any difference between the two?

Thank you again

PBF
0
If you are ABLE TO do something, I doesn't mean you do it.

I am able to sing the alphabet backwards, keeping the tune of the "alphabet song" from Sesame Street.

However, I don't often do it.

You may be ABLE to speak English at a near-native level, but if no one around you speaks or understands English, you probably won't.

If you say "When I go to California nex
0
I see. Thanks for the explanation, GG.

PBF
0
PeaceblinkfriendThanks for your reply, CB.

Not a doubt it's equally idiomatic in the rest of the English world then. Just wondering. Is there any difference between the two?

0
No doubt it's very tricky and difficult, CB.Emotion: big smile

My question was tricky enough. It can be construed in more than one way.
0
PeaceblinkfriendI was just wondering is it if/whether it is ungrammatical to say 'not a doubt' ? Because I remember hearing people say it. Though not very often at all.

It would be unidiomatic in Helsinki English as an opening phrase in a sentence.
0
0
Ah, I see. Thank you for the explanation, Cool Breeze.Emotion: smile

PBF

Related Questions