0
Usenet Posted 23 years ago
Usage

BBC News site headlines: Today's crop

Not funny today, but still Dead Wrong:
"Officer resigns over racism film"
(He doesn't think it should have been shown? Probably not, but that's not why he resigned. He resigned because he was exposed as a racist thug by the film, bang to rights.)
"Italy PM back in Strasbourg fray"
(There's a fray because he's back in Strasbourg? He's in another Strasbourg fray? Answer: Neither, as the beginning of the story makes clear: "It is the first visit to the parliament for Mr Berlusconi ")
"Everlys join Simon & Garfunkel"
(A new Fab Four? No, the Evs are just S&G's new support act.)

Ross Howard
  

Top answer

[nq:1]Not funny today, but still Dead Wrong: "Officer resigns over racism film" (He doesn't think it should have been shown? Berlusconi ") "Everlys join Simon & Garfunkel" (A new Fab Four? )[/nq] On the other hand the job of the headline writer is to get you to read the story by piquing your curiosity.

  • [nq:1]Not funny today, but still Dead Wrong: "Officer resigns over racism film" (He doesn't think it should have been shown?
  • Berlusconi ") "Everlys join Simon & Garfunkel" (A new Fab Four?
  • )[/nq] On the other hand the job of the headline writer is to get you to read the story by piquing your curiosity.
  • Plus, they under tremendous space constraints, it's often impossible to summarize comprehensively what the story is about.
  • Result: a kind of headline shorthand style has arisen that most readers are accustomed to and if they have been following a particular story, such as the first example you cite, they will have at least an inkling what this new development may mean.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

25 Answers
0
[nq:1]Not funny today, but still Dead Wrong: "Officer resigns over racism film" (He doesn't think it should have been shown? ... Berlusconi ") "Everlys join Simon & Garfunkel" (A new Fab Four? No, the Evs are just S&G's new support act.)[/nq]
On the other hand the job of the headline writer is to get you to read the story by piquing your curiosity. Plus, they under tremendous space constraints
0
[nq:1]Not funny today, but still Dead Wrong: "Everlys join Simon & Garfunkel" (A new Fab Four? No, the Evs are just S&G's new support act.)[/nq]
Not surgeons who wished to create a new kind of conjoined twin?
John Dean
Oxford
De-frag to reply
0
[nq:2]Not funny today, but still Dead Wrong: "Everlys join Simon & Garfunkel" (A new Fab Four? No, the Evs are just S&G's new support act.)[/nq]
[nq:1]Not surgeons who wished to create a new kind of conjoined twin?[/nq]
Which reminds me have we done "conjoined" here yet? If not, perhaps we should; "Siamese" isn't confusing or offensive, since the nationality is now called "Thai". "Conjoine
0
[nq:1]Result: a kind of headline shorthand style has arisen that most readers are accustomed to[/nq]
It fits on the page.
But do newsreaders know how silly they sound when they use it in speech? It spread, along with the newsreader double-act, until all stations became infected. Weird.

Paul
My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003):
0
[nq:1]If the "Everlys join Simon & Garfunkel" read "Everlys join Simon & Garfunkel on tour as their opening act" it would be more accurate, certainly, but it would not fit in the space[/nq]
"Everlys to open for Simon & Garfunkel." Might have fit.

"Everlys to open for S & G." Might have worked, depending...

Dena Jo
(Email: Replace TPUBGTH with denajo2)
0
Ross Howard wrote, in part:
[nq:1]Which reminds me have we done "conjoined" here yet? If not, perhaps we should; "Siamese" isn't confusing or offensive, since the nationality is now called "Thai". "Conjoined" was probably coined by the person responsible for "SARS". Why not call them "fused twins"?[/nq]
That makes me wonder what cruel *** fused them together.

SML
ess el five s
0
[nq:2]Not surgeons who wished to create a new kind of conjoined twin?[/nq]
[nq:1]Which reminds me have we done "conjoined" here yet? If not, perhaps we should; "Siamese" isn't confusing or offensive, ... even more accurate than "conjoined" in some ways (they generally share certain systems, as well as being physically joined together).[/nq]
Confusing to people who might wonder why two Engl
0
[nq:2]Not surgeons who wished to create a new kind of conjoined twin?[/nq]
[nq:1]Which reminds me have we done "conjoined" here yet? If not, perhaps we should; "Siamese" isn't confusing or offensive, ... even more accurate than "conjoined" in some ways (they generally share certain systems, as well as being physically joined together).[/nq]
I suspect that they were called something other t
0
The inimitable Ross Howard (Email Removed) stated one day
[nq:2]Not surgeons who wished to create a new kind of conjoined twin?[/nq]
[nq:1]Which reminds me have we done "conjoined" here yet? If not, perhaps we should; "Siamese" isn't confusing or offensive, ... even more accurate than "conjoined" in some ways (they generally share certain systems, as well as being physically joined togethe
0
[nq:1]Ross Howard wrote, in part:[/nq]
[nq:2]Which reminds me have we done "conjoined" here yet? ... person responsible for "SARS". Why not call them "fused twins"?[/nq]
[nq:1]That makes me wonder what cruel *** fused them together.[/nq]
Are they conjoined, are they fused?
Or even worse - are they confused?
Phil

Unpatched IE vulnerability: mhtml wecerr CAB flip
Des

Related Questions