The past perfect is a relatively "complicated" tense, and people may dispense with it if does not seem essential to conveying the meaning. Note also that "he'd bought" and "he bought" can sound very similar.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Rom ReignsSo if the past tense is left unchanged in reported speech then what may be the reason ?Is it because the the reporting words are still true at the time of reporting or is it to avoid the statement from being too wordy ?RRThe concept of being "true at the time of reporting" is hardly applicable to "he bought a car" (unlike "he lives in London", for e
GPYThe concept of being "true at the time of reporting" is hardly applicable to "he bought a car" (unlike "he lives in London", for example).So you mean to say that if the simple past tense is left unchanged in indirect speech then it is not because of the reason that the "reporting words are still true at the time of reporting."
Rom Reigns what will you say about the sentences ?He asked what his name is.He asked where you live.Here how do you justify for not back shifting the tenses ?RRIt does not need justifying. Read the whole thread.
Rom ReignsYou see, If the sentence was - He said that he lives in London. Here I know it is completely natural to not back shift the tense if he still lives in London.But what if the sentence is "I asked where he lives." & "I asked what his name is." Here whats the reason for not back shifting the tenses ?The reporter is reporting that the person who asked th