0
Ahn Posted 19 years ago
Grammar
at the ratio of
StartFragment>
The cost associated with this measures should be shared by South Korea and China at the ratio of three to seven, considering several conditions.
Does this make sense? Especially the purple colored part. I mean China and South Korea should share the cost at the ratio of 3:7.
The cost associated with this measures should be shared by South Korea and China at the ratio of three to seven, considering several conditions.
Does this make sense? Especially the purple colored part. I mean China and South Korea should share the cost at the ratio of 3:7.
Top answer
Ahn The cost (s) associated with these measures should be shared by South Korea and China at a ratio of three to seven , considering several conditions . Hi Ahn My suggestions are in blue in the quote. The part in red is odd to me and I don't really understand what you're trying to say.
- Ahn The cost (s) associated with these measures should be shared by South Korea and China at a ratio of three to seven , considering several conditions .
- Hi Ahn My suggestions are in blue in the quote.
- The part in red is odd to me and I don't really understand what you're trying to say.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
18 Answers
0
AhnThe cost(s) associated with these measures should be shared by South Korea and China at a ratio of three to seven, considering several conditions.Hi Ahn
My suggestions
00
Thank you for your correction, Yankee.
As for the red part, I want to tell that 'I considered several conditions(which will be stated in the next part) and concluded that SK and China should share the costs at a ratio of 3 to 7'
Should I correc it?
As for the red part, I want to tell that 'I considered several conditions(which will be stated in the next part) and concluded that SK and China should share the costs at a ratio of 3 to 7'
Should I correc it?
00
0
0
Hi,
As noted by other people, you need to state your meaning in some other way.
Clive
As noted by other people, you need to state your meaning in some other way.
Clive
00
StartFragment>
The costs associated with these measures should be shared by South Korea and China in the ratio of three to seven in several aspects.
Then, what about 'in several aspects' instead?
The costs associated with these measures should be shared by South Korea and China in the ratio of three to seven in several aspects.
Then, what about 'in several aspects' instead?
00
Hi,
The costs associated with these measures should be shared by South Korea and China in the ratio of three to seven in several aspects.
Then, what about 'in several aspects' instead?
I still don't understand your meaning. Do these aspects have an effect on the sharing, or on the ratio? Perha
The costs associated with these measures should be shared by South Korea and China in the ratio of three to seven in several aspects.
Then, what about 'in several aspects' instead?
I still don't understand your meaning. Do these aspects have an effect on the sharing, or on the ratio? Perha
00
These aspects have an effect on the ratio of the costs involved in the measure for yellow dust form China to Korea.
For example, by the 'Polluter Pays Principle', China should bear more costs than Korea because the yellow dust is blown from China.
And 'Polluter Pays Principle' is one of the aspects to be considered.
Thank you for you help, Clive.
For example, by the 'Polluter Pays Principle', China should bear more costs than Korea because the yellow dust is blown from China.
And 'Polluter Pays Principle' is one of the aspects to be considered.
Thank you for you help, Clive.
00
Hi,
Perhaps you could say
The costs associated with these measures should be shared by South Korea and China in the ratio of three to seven, for several reasons.
The polluter pays sounds like a reason or principle, rather than an aspect.
Best wishes, Clive
Perhaps you could say
The costs associated with these measures should be shared by South Korea and China in the ratio of three to seven, for several reasons.
The polluter pays sounds like a reason or principle, rather than an aspect.
Best wishes, Clive
00
Related Questions