They are different propositions, Mimi. (1) "at least one of A and B" = one of both A and B, as a minimum, so 2 'things' as a minimum. (2) "at least one of A or B" = either one A or one B, as a minimum, so 1 'thing' as a minimum.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Historically, "or" was considered ambiguous, so the language "one of A and B" was used as a substitute for just "A or B", not for "one of A or B". The law seems to have shifted, at least as far as the USPTO is concerned, so that "or" is now acceptable and "one of A and B" is now disfavored. I wonder if the courts agree with the USPTO?
At least one of A or B means "either A or B or both".
At least one of A and B means exactly the same.
However, the former is more natural (to me, a native English speaker, with more than 40 years of experience, and with brilliant English). The former should be used. A google search confirms it is the more common version.