0
Anonymous Posted 10 years ago
Grammar
...as to have been...
I'm a little bit confused about the consistency between the following sentences both. I wonder if the sentences both have been the rephrase version to each other.
1. She was nourished in such an old-fashioned atmosphere that she had been a representative of Victorian womanhood.
2. She was nourished in such an old-fashioned atmosphere as to have been a representative of Victorian womanhood.
Are both sentences above correct and consistent in the same meaning??
1. She was nourished in such an old-fashioned atmosphere that she had been a representative of Victorian womanhood.
2. She was nourished in such an old-fashioned atmosphere as to have been a representative of Victorian womanhood.
Are both sentences above correct and consistent in the same meaning??
Top answer
Anonymous Are both sentences above correct and consistent in the same meaning?? They seem to be written a hundred years ago when literary styles were quite different from today's. Where did you find these sentences?
- Anonymous Are both sentences above correct and consistent in the same meaning??
- They seem to be written a hundred years ago when literary styles were quite different from today's.
- Where did you find these sentences?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
AnonymousAre both sentences above correct and consistent in the same meaning??They seem to be written a hundred years ago when literary styles were quite different from today's. Where did you find these sentences?
0
Related Questions