0
Navitasan Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

As summarized in

Michael Paulkovich revived this project as summarized in the current issue of Free Inquiry.

Source:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nigel-barber/if-jesus-never-existed-re_b_5883198.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592

Wouldn't a comma before 'as summarized' change the meaning of the sentence?

The way it is written, 'this project as summarized in the current issue of Free Inquiry' becomes a single unit, does it not?

If there is a comma, then the phrase becomes adverbial and modifies 'revived this project'. That way the Free Inquiry piece summarizes MP's reviving.

Is this analysis correct?

Gratefully,
Navi.
  

Top answer

The interpretation "Michael Paulkovich revived [ this project as summarized in the current issue of Free Inquiry ]" does not seem very feasible to me. e. that the revival of the project is summarised in the publication.

  • The interpretation "Michael Paulkovich revived [ this project as summarized in the current issue of Free Inquiry ]" does not seem very feasible to me.
  • e.
  • that the revival of the project is summarised in the publication.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
The interpretation "Michael Paulkovich revived [ this project as summarized in the current issue of Free Inquiry ]" does not seem very feasible to me. I believe that the sentence is not ideally punctuated and ought to have a comma, but without a comma I interpret it the same, i.e. that the revival of the project is summarised in the publication.

Related Questions