0
Navitasan Posted 11 years ago
Grammar
As proposed by
1) The transformation of these substances, as proposed by Helen, is not feasible.
2) The transformation of these substances as proposed by Helen is not feasible.
3) The transformation of these substances, as suggested by Helen, is not feasible.
4) The transformation of these substances as suggested by Helen is not feasible.
In which case:
a) Helen has proposed that the substances be transformed, but that is not possible
and in which:
b) Helen has proposed a particular method for the transformation of the substances, but that method cannot be used.
Gratefully,
Navi.
2) The transformation of these substances as proposed by Helen is not feasible.
3) The transformation of these substances, as suggested by Helen, is not feasible.
4) The transformation of these substances as suggested by Helen is not feasible.
In which case:
a) Helen has proposed that the substances be transformed, but that is not possible
and in which:
b) Helen has proposed a particular method for the transformation of the substances, but that method cannot be used.
Gratefully,
Navi.
Top answer
a 1, 3 b 2, 4 Good heavens! After all your posts, haven't you learned restrictive and non-restrictive clauses yet? Please google those terms—there is a plethora of information about them.
- a 1, 3 b 2, 4 Good heavens!
- After all your posts, haven't you learned restrictive and non-restrictive clauses yet?
- Please google those terms—there is a plethora of information about them.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
a 1, 3
b 2, 4
Good heavens! After all your posts, haven't you learned restrictive and non-restrictive clauses yet? Please google those terms—there is a plethora of information about them.
b 2, 4
Good heavens! After all your posts, haven't you learned restrictive and non-restrictive clauses yet? Please google those terms—there is a plethora of information about them.
0
Related Questions