The first two are OK. I wouldn't use the second two.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
New2grammarIs there redundancy? For example,Not redundancy--repetition for emphasis and clarity. It's hard to come up with good examples on the spur of the moment; however, here is a good example I found on the site linked below.
A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as a Google search for XYZ does.
Yoong LiatI would say that 'does' is optional and the sentence sounds better without the word.Quite right, I noticed that on re-reading the post.
New2grammarPeace, I wanted to ask your question but
That for or that of... Think about it a minute.
I was going back and forth between 'that of' and 'that for' as well and then I settled down with 'that of'. It sounded better that way to my ears though I know it doesn't really corre
PeaceblinkfriendWhat about this? Do you think this is better or worse?I think your version has a different structure in the later part. The later part needs the structure of "results in", IMO. "that of" or this kind works i
A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as that of "XYZ".