0
Liveinjapan Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

as many as

A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times more hits than a Google search for "XYZ" does.
A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as a Google search for XYZ does.
On Google search, "ABC" is found ten times more than "XYZ" is.
On Google search, "ABC" has ten times as many hits as "XYZ" has.

Arey they all correct?
Thanks.
  

Top answer

The first two are OK. I wouldn't use the second two.

  • The first two are OK.
  • I wouldn't use the second two.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
The first two are OK. I wouldn't use the second two.
0
Is there redundancy? For example,

A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as a Google search for XYZ does.
0
I would say that 'does' is optional and the sentence sounds better without the word.
0
New2grammarIs there redundancy? For example,

A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as a Google search for XYZ does.

Not redundancy--repetition for emphasis and clarity. It's hard to come up with good examples on the spur of the moment; however, here is a good example I found on the site linked below.
0
Yoong LiatI would say that 'does' is optional and the sentence sounds better without the word.

Quite right, I noticed that on re-reading the post.
0
What about this? Do you think this is better or worse?

A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as that of "XYZ".

Looking forward to reading your replies.

PBF
0
Peace, I wanted to ask your question but

That for or that of... Think about it a minute.
0
New2grammarPeace, I wanted to ask your question but

That for or that of... Think about it a minute.


I was going back and forth between 'that of' and 'that for' as well and then I settled down with 'that of'. It sounded better that way to my ears though I know it doesn't really corre
0
Thanks, RayH.
Thanks everyone!
PeaceblinkfriendWhat about this? Do you think this is better or worse?

A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as that of "XYZ".

I think your version has a different structure in the later part. The later part needs the structure of "results in", IMO. "that of" or this kind works i

Related Questions