As a scientist I want to rip the theory of nuclear winter apart, but as a human being I want to believe it. This is one of the rare instances of a genuine conflict between the demands of science and the demands of humanity. As a scientist, I judge the nuclear winter theory to be a sloppy piece of work, full of gaps and unjustified assumptions. As a human being, I hope fervently that it is right. Here is a real and uncomfortable dilemma. What does a scientist do when science and humanity pull in opposite directions?[53]
I agreed emphatically with Henry Stimson. Once we had got ourselves into the business of bombing cities, we might as well do the job competently and get it over with. I felt better that morning than I had felt for years… Those fellows who had built the atomic bombs obviously knew their stuff… Later, much later, I would remember [the downside].[54]
SweetFreedom 1) Does "As a scientist I want to rip the theory of nuclear winter apart" mean "As a scientist I want to tear the theory of nuclear winter into pieces/destroy the theory"? "destroy the theory". Yes.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
SweetFreedom1) Does "As a scientist I want to rip the theory of nuclear winter apart" mean "As a scientist I want to tear the theory of nuclear winter into pieces/destroy the theory"?"destroy the theory". Yes.
SweetFreedom2) Does "who had built the atomic bombs obviously knew their stuff" mean "who had built the atomic bombs obviously