The writer is writing as if it is the only such service. Perhaps he does not know of the others, or perhaps he just wants to pretend his service is unique. Clive
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
nkspbIf I give a bunch of tools to my friend and say:"These are the tools I took from you"can it mean that these are some of them in some context?No
nkspbIf I am with a friend on a party and then say: "Look at that person. He is the person who I adore"Can it mean that he is the only of this kind at the party?I suppose it could, if the two people have been talking about the men at he party and discussing how attractive they found them.
nkspb2) If I give a bunch of tools to my friend and say:"These are the tools I took from you"can it mean that these are some of them in some context? - Like when there are several boxes of tools, and I show at one and say this phrase. - Or when we are entering some room and there is a table there and tools on it, I say this phrase and it means "These are those of the tool
nkspbWhat isn't clear is why "the tools I took from you" can't be understood like some of them within the contexts I provided in my previous post quoted by you?It seems to be eventually the same as an example about a person at the party.For the person at the party I created a context in which the speakers were already talking only about the men in the room. T
fivejedjonThe definite article in combination with a defining context defines precisely the singular or plural noun that it defines.Yes, it is rather an overdefined phrase