0
Reegis Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Articles: The artist sketched a/the silhouette of an african elephant at sunset.

Hello,

let's say I am at an exhibition and would like to comment on one encountered painting to my friend:

1) The artist sketched a silhouette of an african elephant at sunset.
2) The artist sketched the silhouette of an african elephant at sunset.

Which sentence is correct? And why?
  

Top answer

Without further context, #1 would be the right choice. #2 implies that you're talking about a specific/known/previously mentioned or assumed silhouette.

  • Without further context, #1 would be the right choice.
  • #2 implies that you're talking about a specific/known/previously mentioned or assumed silhouette.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

16 Answers
0
Without further context, #1 would be the right choice.
#2 implies that you're talking about a specific/known/previously mentioned or assumed silhouette.
0
The whole context could be like this:
None of them has ever seen this painting (and this silhouette) before, and one of them just points at this painting and says this sentence. So, this silhouette is neither known nor previously mentioned, but is specific as this is the silhouette that is seen on the painting.

Then do I get you right that you would use 2?
0
Let's say I am at an exhibition and would like to comment on one encountered painting to my friend.

If the elephant is in the painting, then I would say "the shadow (silhouette) of an elephant."
0
AlpheccaStarsLet's say I am at an exhibition and would like to comment on one encountered painting to my friend.
May I ask why did you cross out the word encountered? What I wanted to convey was as follows: I was at an exhibition, came across one painting, and then commented on it to my friend. So, the word encountered was used above as an
0
Reegis I was at an exhibition, came across one painting, and then commented on it to my friend. So, the word encountered was used above as an adjective that describes this painting as the one that was encountered by me. Is it wrong?
It is unnatural for several reasons.
First, a few past participles can be used as pre-modifiers, but most cannot.
"Encoun
0
AlpheccaStars"Encountered" is not a description or quality of an object.
It is interesting. Then cannot I use it even for objects that I meet by accident or that are more abstract? For example:
Last month I went on a trip to Egypt and wanted to visit a pyramid but some people blocked my way and threatened to do harm to me. The encountered threat wasn't
0
ReegisThe encountered threat wasn't a pleasant experience.
No. That does not work.

The problems we encountered were not difficult to overcome.
Reegis The friends encountered yesterday were...
OK. This is a reduced relative clause.
The friends who(m) I encountered yesterday...
Reegis
0
AlpheccaStarsNo. That does not work.
One more try: if you type in google "the encountered resistance" (with the apostrophes to look for the whole phrase), then what do you think about these examples?
AlpheccaStarsWe used to make silhouettes in elementary school as an art project. They used to be very popular before photography.
0
ReegisOne more try: if you type in google "the encountered resistance" (with the apostrophes to look for the whole phrase), then what do you think about these examples?
You keep changing the noun! "Encountered resistance" is a technical term that is recently developed. .

Related Questions