Without further context, #1 would be the right choice. #2 implies that you're talking about a specific/known/previously mentioned or assumed silhouette.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AlpheccaStarsLet's say I am at an exhibition and would like to comment on one encountered painting to my friend.May I ask why did you cross out the word encountered? What I wanted to convey was as follows: I was at an exhibition, came across one painting, and then commented on it to my friend. So, the word encountered was used above as an
Reegis I was at an exhibition, came across one painting, and then commented on it to my friend. So, the word encountered was used above as an adjective that describes this painting as the one that was encountered by me. Is it wrong?It is unnatural for several reasons.
AlpheccaStars"Encountered" is not a description or quality of an object.It is interesting. Then cannot I use it even for objects that I meet by accident or that are more abstract? For example:
ReegisThe encountered threat wasn't a pleasant experience.No. That does not work.
Reegis The friends encountered yesterday were...OK. This is a reduced relative clause.
Reegis
AlpheccaStarsNo. That does not work.One more try: if you type in google "the encountered resistance" (with the apostrophes to look for the whole phrase), then what do you think about these examples?
AlpheccaStarsWe used to make silhouettes in elementary school as an art project. They used to be very popular before photography.
ReegisOne more try: if you type in google "the encountered resistance" (with the apostrophes to look for the whole phrase), then what do you think about these examples?You keep changing the noun! "Encountered resistance" is a technical term that is recently developed. .