0
Reegis Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Articles: first mention vs later mention vs specificity

Hello, good people on this Forum.

I think that my knowledge about articles has increased quite a lot recently and I would like to sum up a few things to make sure I understand this topic correctly.

We all know that we should use an indefinite article when it is first mention. And what I find interesting is that it does not matter whether it is unspecific (any one as an example):
a) A comet appears to have a tail as it streaks through the sky.
Or specific (one in particular):
b) A comet was seen in the western sky last night.

On top of that, I have discovered recently a (the?) thing called "later mention", for example:
c) The piece with the black center.
"piece" has a definte article even though it is first mention, because this object is identified by the words that are later ("with the black center").

Please say if anything I stated above is not correct.

Now, let me compare two sentences that I have doubts about:
1) A comet was seen in the western sky last night, and it was small.
2) The comet that was seen in the western sky last night was small.
For me, they seem to mean the same, however, I decided to use different articles, because I think the first one is 'pure' first mention while the second one is later mention.
Is my reasoning correct?

Ufff, I produced so much text. I hope someone will be able to cope with it Emotion: smile
  

Top answer

Reegis Please say if anything I stated above is not correct. Usually correct. All I would say again is to remember that exceptions and additional complexities exist ...

  • Reegis Please say if anything I stated above is not correct.
  • Usually correct.
  • All I would say again is to remember that exceptions and additional complexities exist ...
  • Reegis We all know that we should use an indefinite article when it is first mention.
  • for example, "The mobile phone is an indispensible part of modern life" uses the definite article at first mention, as does "The people have spoken".
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
ReegisPlease say if anything I stated above is not correct.
Usually correct. All I would say again is to remember that exceptions and additional complexities exist ...
ReegisWe all know that we should use an indefinite article when it is first mention.
... for example, "The mobile phone is an indispensible part of modern lif
0
GPYUsually correct. All I would say again is to remember that exceptions and additional complexities exist ...
Yes, I will bear this in mind. I have encountered such cases many times and already know this pain...
GPY"The mobile phone is an indispensible part of modern life"
Do you know the explanation of this exception? Maybe
0
ReegisLike in "The lion lives in Africa".
Yes, it's the same idea. It's a generic reference, sometimes explained as one element of a class standing for a whole class of objects, though personally I don't intuitively think of it that way. I think of it more as a reference to an abstract concept of "mobile phone" or "lion".
ReegisAnd here
0
GPY I think of it more as a reference to an abstract concept of "mobile phone" or "lion".
It sounds similar to what I read in an exceptionally good article by John Lawler:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jlawler/000001.html

Where he compares the definite
0
First, just to go back to one of your earlier examples:

a) The comet that was seen in the western sky last night ...
b) A comet that was seen in the western sky last night ...

(a) presupposes that it is already known that a comet was seen, while (b) does not. I don't think my previous reply made this clear.
Reegis"...uses the definite art
0
GPYa) The comet that was seen in the western sky last night ...b) A comet that was seen in the western sky last night ...
Hmmm, please note that sentence b) (my #1) was a little bit different (without 'that'):
1) A comet was seen in the western sky last night, and it was small.
2) The comet that was seen in the western sky last
0
ReegisHmmm, please note that sentence b) (my #1) was a little bit different (without 'that'):
Yes, these were intended as variants on your sentence 2 only. I should have labelled them 2a and 2b.
ReegisAre you sure that sentence b) is grammatically correct?
Yes. (Obviously it needs more words to make it a grammatically comple
0
GPYYes, these were intended as variants on your sentence 2 only. I should have labelled them 2a and 2b.
Now I see. There really are so many subtleties when it comes to articles...
GPYThere isn't really a concept of a "class" of indefinite articles, in my view. There are individual instances of use, but they don't have the individuality o

Related Questions