0
Anonymous Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

article before a quoted content question

Hi,
I am pretty sure and think Mr. M said something to the effect that putting an article before a quoted content like below or make a plural out of the kind below is to be avoid like a plague but I sometimes see people doing at least the former with a somewhat noticeable frequency. Is this OK? Why would you consider this OK?

he said that he could tack on an "I am John Doe and I wrote this disclaimer."

On a second thought, this can be thought of as an advertisement content -- a sort of writing on an ad. Does it have any effect on the use?
  

Top answer

) Pluralising quoted text by adding "s" is ugly in my view. ' ".

  • ) Pluralising quoted text by adding "s" is ugly in my view.
  • ' ".
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
I don't personally think that this is an egregious error in informal writing, but I would avoid it in formal writing, where I'd say something like:

He said that he could append a clause to read "I am John Doe and I wrote this disclaimer."

(The only reason I used "append" is that "tack on" is kind of informal, and this is supposed to be a formal sentence.)

Pluralis
0
Thank you. What makes it good or correct to have an article here? I am not completely sure what it takes to put an article like the indefinite article.

he said that he could tack on an "I am John Doe and I wrote this disclaimer."
0
I'm not sure I'd go quite so far as to say that this style is "good" or "correct". I just don't think it's as dreadfully bad as your original post suggested. To me, including the article is often a chatty way of suggesting a standard form of words that can be reused to serve a set purpose.

To give a different example:

We'd had a massive row, so I added "PS I love you" at the e

Related Questions