Dealer's choice, mostly, Taka. I can rationalize them to satisfy myself: removal and change are defined later in the clause, but the writer is making this a 'new' idea. The because the idea is now in place and 'substitution' happens one-for-one; it also varies the vocabulary.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Mister Micawber Sorry, what part don't you understand, Taka?
removal and change are defined later in the clause, but the writer is making this a 'new' idea. The because the idea is now in place and 'substitution' happens one-for-one; it also varies the vocabulary.
MrPedanticAnd I suppose a cautious writer might wish to imply that culture shock is only one removal or change in meaning of the familiar signals – in other words, that the part I've underlined might define other phenomena as well.
Clive
But if 'unparallel' articles are used, it makes me start to think that the writer had a reason, and thus to ponder the impact of the articles on the meaning.