There is no difference between "mad at" and "angry with". In the US, you'll be more likely to hear "mad at" in informal conversation. John
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
A Ram Hwang I thought that mad means insane.Yes, it does. However, you can be mad (insane) with anger. The expression is more North American than British; a Brit would probably frown at the expression and have a similar reaction to yours. I know that was mine when I first came to Canada.
A Ram HwangYou mean that you use "mad at" and "angry with" in different situation?I think it is my own pattern. My family tells me I use ‘mad at’ and ‘angry with’ interchangeably, and also ‘mad with’ too, but not ‘angry at’.
Is it general? or is it your own pattern?
Actually, "mad at" sounds like an informal words.
"Mad at someone/something" means being angry, furious with someone, or something.
The formal definition of mad is mentally ill or insane. People frequently use the word mad when they mean angry, which is incorrect usage. Angry contains the strong feelings of hostility and displeasure. Upset contains the emotions