The following are two sentences about the same thing. Are they both correct? Can you tell me which one is better if they are?why? thanks for your help:)
1:If we fail to analyze it properly and to understand it correctly, we shall become overcautious, not daring to lose opportunities. Like a boat sailing against the current, we must forge ahead or be swept downstream.
2:If we fail to analyze it properly and to understand it correctly, we shall become overcautious, not daring to lose opportunities,which means we,like a boat sailing against the current,must forge ahead or be swept downstream.
Top answer
The second version is too wordy. You lose your reader. But it's a conflicting message: It sounds like you're saying "Stop!
— BarbaraPA
The second version is too wordy.
You lose your reader.
But it's a conflicting message: It sounds like you're saying "Stop!
Make sure we've got this properly analyzed and we understand it first" and they you're saying "Don't be so cautious!
" What do you mean by "no daring to lose opportunities"?
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The second version is too wordy. You lose your reader.
But it's a conflicting message: It sounds like you're saying "Stop! Make sure we've got this properly analyzed and we understand it first" and they you're saying "Don't be so cautious! Forge ahead!"
What do you mean by "no daring to lose opportunities"? You WANT them to lose opportunities?
If we fail to analyze it properly and to understand it correctly, we shall become overcautious,not daring to emamcipate our minds and act freely. Consequently, we shall lose opportunities. Like a boat sailing against the current,we must forge ahead or be swept downstream.
The last sentence,"Like a boat sailing against the current,we must forge ahead or