Anonymous You, native speakers of English, treat this as an ungrammatical sentence today? Yes. Even if a word or word group was once grammatical centuries ago, if it is not grammatical in modern English, we say it's ungrammatical.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousYou, native speakers of English, treat this as an ungrammatical sentence today?Yes. Even if a word or word group was once grammatical centuries ago, if it is not grammatical in modern English, we say it's ungrammatical. We assume everyone on this forum is interested in learning or attempting to improve their mastery of modern English.
AnonymousI want to know whether "archaic" denotes directly "ungrammatical" or not.No, it means that it used to be grammatical, and the language evolved. These old forms are not used any more.
CalifJimThere is no need to trouble yourself over such insignificant details. What is ungrammatical depends on the time period when it was written. What used to be grammatical long ago may be ungrammatical now, and vice versa. Concentrate on modern English.Thank you for your help. Recently, I have seen "MINE" as a possessive for the first time after watching
PhilipArchaic does not denote lack of correctness, but I would not use a word so designated unless there is a specific (poetic, perhaps) reason for using it. "Mine eyes" is, of course, grammatical in an old-fashioned sense; but because it is archaic, we shouldn't generally use it.I’ll keep in mind that archaic does not denote lack of correctness. If there is
Blue JayMark mine words would be wrong anyway. Mine was used before a vowel, and my before a consonant.Come to think of it, your comment really hits the nail on the head.
AnonymousThe translater would have used on purpose “MARK MINE WORDS” in the upper left to show the character of old-fashioned manners.Yes, and the translator is basically a fool, because even in earlier times "mine" was not used like that.