It depends. If the project is completed and they are making excuses after the event, then 'were'. If the project is still in progress and they are explaining why is won't be finished on time, then 'are'.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
DiamondrgI agree with Nona.
We are prevented from completing the project on time due to unforeseen circumstances.
Do you detect any grammatical mistakes in this sentence? In my opinion, it would be better if "are" were "were". What do you think?
YankeeMost companies I'm familiar with would begin the sentence with "Due to" and would also avoid using "we" directly in combination with an admission of failure (whether it's their fault or not, but particularly if they feel they are not at fault). They would attempt to make the sentence as neutral and as positive as possible.
Due to unforeseen circumstance
Yoong LiatSome books on English usage say that it should be : Owing to (not Due to) unforeseen circumstances, the project will (have to) be completed later than the date originally planned.
YankeeYoong LiatSome books on English usage say that it should be : Owing to (not Due to) unforeseen circumstances, the project will (have to) be completed later than the date originally planned.It would be quite unlikely for an American company to use "owing to" in a sentence such as this. Due to is and