MUSCOVITE Is there any diffirence between the two versions? There is no difference in meaning. Though the first is, I believe, acceptable, I eschew it and caution against its use.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
MUSCOVITEIs there any diffirence between the two versions?There is no difference in meaning. Though the first is, I believe, acceptable, I eschew it and caution against its use.
MUSCOVITE2) Do I understand correctly that"We assigned him as treasurer" is OK whereas "We assigned him treasurer" is not grammatical?This of cou
Mister Micawberboth of them seem wrong to meWhat if I used the passive voice, "He is assigned (as) treasurer"?
MUSCOVITEWhat if I used the passive voice, "He is assigned (as) treasurer"?Evidently it is in use, though it still sounds a little 'off' to me. How many hits did you get on COCA?
MUSCOVITEThe search combination was "was assigned as", and I got a total of 25 hits. If I filter out some "irrelevant" hits, there will be about a dozen hits (PERSON was assigned as POSITION) I guess.So, not too common, anyway.