Apart from irregular noun, do we always convert noun to plural by simply adding s, or es for those end with s, or just an apostrophe s for plural noun that ends with s?
I have seen people add an apostrophe before adding an s or es for the plural, not for the possessive case but for some odd or made-up nouns, such as stat dec's and so on just to show the actual spelling of the word in question. Is it legitimate?
healer I have seen people add an apostrophe before adding an s or es for the plural, not for the possessive case but for some odd or made-up nouns, such as stat dec's and so on just to show the actual spelling of the word in question. Is it legitimate? I can't see using "'es" in any event.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
healerI have seen people add an apostrophe before adding an s or es for the plural, not for the possessive case but for some odd or made-up nouns, such as stat dec's and so on just to show the actual spelling of the word in question. Is it legitimate?
I can't see using "'es" in any event. The plurals of ad hoc abbreviations should be formed in the re
If a noun ends in an s-sound, the plural ending is es: two watches, two dresses.
Decades ago, some grammarians observed a rule that said an apostrophe should be used if the plural s was added to something other than a word. This gave us
the 1980's, some MP's, lots of DVD's
I'm not saying that the above plurals are wrong, but the apostrophe certain