0
Angliholic Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

any solid food is suitable as/for stuffing

When Westerners eat a turkey, they usually put all kinds of stuffing in a turkey’s belly. Basically, any solid food is suitable as/for stuffing. Bread, cereal, vegetables, spices and eggs are among the most common kinds of stuffing. Sometimes a turkey is stuffed with other birds. For example, “Turducken”—a turkey stuffed with a duck stuffed with a chicken—is becoming more popular. You get to eat three birds at the same time! This kind of turkey cooking comes from Louisiana, a southern American city that is the home of many strange foods.



Which fits into the above context better, as or for? Thanks.
  

Top answer

Suitable for , which means suitable as an ingredient of stuffing . The items alone are not usually suitable as stuffing.

  • Suitable for , which means suitable as an ingredient of stuffing .
  • The items alone are not usually suitable as stuffing.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

11 Answers
0
Suitable for, which means suitable as an ingredient of stuffing. The items alone are not usually suitable as stuffing.

0
Not that this relates to the grammar, but this is a very strange paragraph. I've never heard of eggs being stuffed inside a turkey, and this idea of three birds inside each other is most strange and nothing I've ever heard of. They wouldn't cook propertly. If they had mentioned deep frying a turkey, that would make more sense!
0
What I find odd is the reference to putting the stuffing in "the turkey's belly." The space where the stuffing goes is usually referred to as the "cavity." "Belly" makes it sound as though the stuffing is going into the turkey's stomach -- which, of course, has been removed, along will all the other internal organs.

I would also take issue with the claim that "any solid food is suitab
0
Thanks, GG.

I appreciate your opinion because the idea in the base sentence also shocks me.
0
I assume that you're translating other material, though, and not making this up as you along? It's sometimes funny what misconceived ideas people have about each other!
0
Thanks, Khoff and GG.
0
I think it was probably an 18th century curiosity.
Well, I'm not that **** old. You can get the fixin's for turducken in the supermarket. My cousin had us one a couple of years ago.

Mmm!

< groan......>
0
You're right, Mr. M. -- the turducken is not the anachronism I thought it was. Googling it finds many contemporary sources for the turducken -- mostly in Louisiana, just like the original post said. Will wonders never cease?
0
KhoffYou're right, Mr. M. -- the turducken is not the anachronism I thought it was. Googling it finds many contemporary sources for the turducken -- mostly in Louisiana, just like the original post said. Will wonders never cease?
Thanks, Khoff.

I find the bolded line in your post very amusing. Just to make sure, is it equivalent to "T

Related Questions