0
Mack&Mack Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

Any human worker and any human workers..

0 In the textbook I'm teaching, there is a sentence that goes "RoboShop doesn't hae any human workers". 02br
02br
00When I got students to translate the equvalent sentence written in my native language into English, some students wrote, 02br
02br
00"RoboShop doesn't hae any human worker". 02br
02br
00I'm wondering if both "any human worker" and "any human workers" are right. In my native language, if translated, they have no difference. How about English? 02br
02br
00If both are correct and there is any subtle difference in meaning or usage, what is it? 02br
02br
02br
00Thanks very much in advance.... 0-
  

Top answer

0 Human worker is one person. 02br 02br 00Human workers would be more than one person, and would be the correct version. Any human worker is not correct though.

  • 0 Human worker is one person.
  • 02br 02br 00Human workers would be more than one person, and would be the correct version.
  • Any human worker is not correct though.
  • 02br 02br 00Or you could say 'RoboShop doesn't have a single human worker' or 'one human worker' and that would be a way of emphasising that it doesn't not have even one, let alone a lot of them.
  • 02br 02br 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
0 Human worker is one person. 02br
02br
00Human workers would be more than one person, and would be the correct version. Any human worker is not correct though. 02br
02br
00Or you could say 'RoboShop doesn't have a single human worker' or 'one human worker' and that would be a way of emphasising that it doesn't not have even one, let alone a lot of them.

Related Questions