0
Xbladefate25 Posted 4 years ago
Grammar

Any differences between "sine qua non" "part and parcel" and "sum and substance"?

Source: THE FREE DICTIONARY

DEFINITIONS:

  1. SINE QUA NON: something that is essential before you can achieve something else

  2. PART AND PARCEL: to be a feature of something, especially a feature that cannot be avoided:

  3. SUM AND SUBSTANCE: The central or most important idea, aspect, or part of something; the essence or summary of something.

EXAMPLES:

  1. SINE QUA NON:

Some consider a good education to be the sine qua non of a successful career.

An interest in children is a sine qua non of teaching

  1. PART AND PARCEL:

Dealing with tantrums is part and parcel of raising a toddler.

I'm afraid customer complaints are part and parcel of this job

  1. SUM AND SUBSTANCE:

The sum and substance of their platform is financial conservatism.

  

Top answer

xbladefate25 Any differences between "sine qua non" "part and parcel" and "sum and substance"? Yes, there are differences. I think the dictionary definitions make that clear enough.

  • xbladefate25 Any differences between "sine qua non" "part and parcel" and "sum and substance"?
  • Yes, there are differences.
  • I think the dictionary definitions make that clear enough.
  • If one thing is the sine qua non (Latin: without that, nothing) of something else, then if you don't have the first thing, you can't logically have the other thing.
  • If one thing is part and parcel of something else, then the first thing always comes with (pairs with) the other thing.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
xbladefate25 Any differences between "sine qua non" "part and parcel" and "sum and substance"?

Yes, there are differences. I think the dictionary definitions make that clear enough.

If one thing is the sine qua non (Latin: without that, nothing) of something else, then if you don't have the first thing, you can't logically have the other thing.

Related Questions