0
Pter Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Antecedent of 'which'

Is the antecedent of 'which' always the noun immediately before 'which'?

For example, a copyright notice on the XYZ website

The permission does not extend to any materials on the linked websites or any contents on the XYZ website, the copyright of which belongs to a third party.

On first reading, I thought 'which' refers to the XYZ website. But this interpretation doesn't make sense. The 'which' supposedly refer to third party contents on the XYZ website.

Is the sentence incorrect? How can it be improved?

Thank you very much.
  

Top answer

See how I applied the brackets to mark the constituencies. [The permission] [does not extend] [to (any materials on the linked websites) or (any contents on the XYZ website)], the copyright of which belongs to a third party. any materials on the linked websites + any contents on the XYZ website = which 'which" refers to the coordinated prepositional complement (coordinated NP).

  • See how I applied the brackets to mark the constituencies.
  • [The permission] [does not extend] [to (any materials on the linked websites) or (any contents on the XYZ website)], the copyright of which belongs to a third party.
  • any materials on the linked websites + any contents on the XYZ website = which 'which" refers to the coordinated prepositional complement (coordinated NP).
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
See how I applied the brackets to mark the constituencies. [The permission] [does not extend] [to (any materials on the linked websites) or (any contents on the XYZ website)], the copyright of which belongs to a third party.

any materials on the linked websites + any contents on the XYZ website = which

'which" refers to the coordinated prepositional complement (coordinated NP).
0
Just want to confirm my understanding. Do you mean 'which' can refer to the whole phrase instead of just the closest noun?

So it is perfectly grammatical for 'which' to refer to X as long as the verb agrees with X?

... X <preposition> Y, which <verb> ....
0
Hello,

Anyone else can reply to my original question below:

Is the antecedent of 'which' always the noun immediately before 'which'?

Using 'which' to refer to the whole coordinated prepositional complement seems to me a bad idea. In my original example, it is possible for 'which' to refer to

1. XYZ website
2. any contents on the XYZ website
3. any mate
0
Hi,

Don't you think this is too ambiguous? Yes, I do.

Would you like to try to rewrite it, showing clearly whatever you think the intended meaning is?



Best wishes, Clive
0
Thanks, Clive.

I agree with Inchoateknowledge on the intended meaning of the sentence. The problem is I can't think of ways to improve it (yet).
0
Also, is the sentence just ambiguous or is it ungrammatical?
0
Hi again,

The permission does not extend to any materials on the linked websites or any contents on the XYZ website, the copyright of which belongs to a third party.

How about something like this?

The permission does not extend to any materials on the linked websites or any contents on the XYZ website. The copyright for all these materials and contents belongs to a
0
PterIs the antecedent of 'which' always the noun immediately before 'which'?

For example, a copyright notice on the XYZ website
The permission does not extend to any materials on the linked websites or any contents on the XYZ website, the copyright of which belongs to a third party.

On first reading, I thought 'which' refers to the XYZ website. But
0
Hi Bill,

Thank you for the explanation.

What confuses me is that some people said 'which' should normally only refer to the closest noun while 'that' is more tolerant. Seems that you don't agree with this. Yes, your rephrased sentence is perfectly understandable in this particular structure, but I did mis-interpret the original sentence when I first read it. I had to reread t

Related Questions