0
Jeff_999 Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

Another sentence completion question

0Dear masters, here is another sentence completion question. Hope you will help me solve it again. Thank you so much in advance. 02br
02br
02br
02br
00 "Despite some allowances for occupational mobility, the normal expectation of seventeenth-century English society was that the child's vocation would develop along familial lines; ---- the career of one's parents was therefore ----.02br
00 A. 00disagreement with .. forbidden02br
00B. 00divergence from .. limited01b02b02br
00C. 00preparation for .. difficult02br
00D. 00reliance on .. unanticipated02br
00 E. 00assumption of .. premature"00 02br
02br
00The answer is B. But, since I don't get what "child's vocation" is, and what the relationsh00ip of "occupational mobility" and "the child's vocation would develop along familial lines" is, I have no idea why C is correct.0-
  

Top answer

02br 02br 00 '.... 02br 02br 00B is correct. 02br 02br 00C is not correct.

  • 02br 02br 00 '....
  • 02br 02br 00B is correct.
  • 02br 02br 00C is not correct.
  • Preparation for the career of one's parents would not necessarily be difficult.
  • The assumption would be that preparation for a career that is already in the family would be easier than preparation for a different career; and the society's expectation that the child would follow in the career of the parents would likely disprove the child's choosing an occupation that differed from that of the parents.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
0'Occupational mobility': the ability to move from one occupation (job) to another.02br
02br
00'The child's vocation...' Vocation means 'calling', which means: a profession, a job, an occupation.02br
02br
00 '.... would develop along familial lines': in 17th century Enlish society, the child would normally take up the same occupation as the parents.0
0
0Thank you so much! 05002br
02br
00 I was intented to say "why B is correct", but accidentally I wrote: "why C is correct". I am so sorry. (You know, our "edit" function is limited. I Just don't get why.)02br
02br
00 But that's okay. It didn't cause any trouble to my understanding your illumination. Thank you.02br
02br
00
0
0I'm glad to be of some help, Jeff. You understood correctly.02br
02br
00Yes, we all await a working edit button.0-

Related Questions