0
Carrot Posted 19 years ago
Grammar
Angry with / at ...
0 Hi 02 br
02 br
00 Recently I heard "I am not angry with you" , and it sounded pretty weird to me... I thought it was supposed to be "angry at s.o." (like mad at s.o. or pissed at s.o. 05 0 00 ) but some friend of mine said it was right, and it is the only way i should talk, because angry at is not correct. On the other hand i heard my US History teacher saying "angry at"... so who was right? and which form is grammatically correct? 010id 5
02 br
00 Recently I heard "I am not angry with you" , and it sounded pretty weird to me... I thought it was supposed to be "angry at s.o." (like mad at s.o. or pissed at s.o. 05 0 00 ) but some friend of mine said it was right, and it is the only way i should talk, because angry at is not correct. On the other hand i heard my US History teacher saying "angry at"... so who was right? and which form is grammatically correct? 010id 5
Top answer
02 br 02 br 00 There is a good explanation here: 05 0 040pid 130878
- 02 br 02 br 00 There is a good explanation here: 05 0 040pid 130878
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
0 Hi, they are both correct but which one you should use depends on the context and meaning. 02 br
02 br
00 There is a good explanation here: 05 0 040pid 130878
02 br
00 There is a good explanation here: 05 0 040pid 130878
0
Related Questions