0
Park sang joon Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

And [though] you would call it a burden, a sacrifice, you are mistaken

The Count Olaf was determined to adopt two orphan siblings for their inheritance.
Count Olaf: Mr. Poe. I will raise these orphans as if they were actually wanted. And though you would call it a burden, a sacrifice, you are mistaken, sir. You should be ashamed of yourself. The idea! (He babbles.) Anyway, where do I sign for the fortune, I mean, children?
<Of the movie "Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events">
I'd like to know why "thought" is used, not "if."
Thank you in advance for your help.
  

Top answer

Dear Park It's a good question. Count Olaf already knows Mr Poe's opinion (that it's a burden) in this case, or at least he is sure that he knows it. He is speaking of a present fact, not a conditional event.

  • Dear Park It's a good question.
  • Count Olaf already knows Mr Poe's opinion (that it's a burden) in this case, or at least he is sure that he knows it.
  • He is speaking of a present fact, not a conditional event.
  • It sounds a little old-fashioned but it's good formal English and still OK to speak or write in this way.
  • Kind regards Michael
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Dear Park

It's a good question. Count Olaf already knows Mr Poe's opinion (that it's a burden) in this case, or at least he is sure that he knows it. He is speaking of a present fact, not a conditional event. It sounds a little old-fashioned but it's good formal English and still OK to speak or write in this way.

Kind regards

Michael
0
Thank you, Michael, for your so very kind answer. Emotion: smile
I think a concessive clause should contrast with a main clause.
But here,
0
Good point again. The sentence is not expressing causation. Think of "though" in this case as similar to "while".

It still is a concessive clause. The main point is that the Mr Poe is mistaken about it being a burden, even though he describes it in that way. Does that make sense now?

Kind regards, Michael

Related Questions