0
Park sang joon Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Analyses of a text

Peggotty is the only maid of his house.

Peggotty and I were sitting one night by the parlour fire alone. I had been reading to Peggotty about crocodiles. I must have read very perspicuously, or the poor soul must have been deeply interested, for I remember she had a cloudy impression, after I had done, that they were a sort of vegetable. I was tired of reading, and dead sleepy, but having leave, as a high treat, to sit up until my mother came home from spending the evening at a neighbour's, I would rather have died upon my post (of course) than have gone to be.
[David Copperfield by Charles Dickens]
I'd like to know "I must have read very perspicuously, or the poor soul must have been deeply interested" is an ironical expression.
I'd like to know why "but" is used without a parallel phrase in "but having leave."
And I'd like to know what "having leave" means here.
Thank you in advance for your help.
  

Top answer

park sang joon I'd like to know "I must have read very perspicuously, or the poor soul must have been deeply interested" is an ironical expression. Yes, that's right. You will find a lot of those in Dickens.

  • park sang joon I'd like to know "I must have read very perspicuously, or the poor soul must have been deeply interested" is an ironical expression.
  • Yes, that's right.
  • You will find a lot of those in Dickens.
  • " Why do you think it needs another parallel phrase?
  • I would rather have died than have gone to bed.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
park sang joonI'd like to know "I must have read very perspicuously, or the poor soul must have been deeply interested" is an ironical expression.
Yes, that's right. You will find a lot of those in Dickens.
park sang joonI'd like to know why "but" is used without a parallel phrase in "but having leave."
Why do you think it
0
Thank you, Mr.Micawber, for your very helpful answer.

Why do you think it needs another parallel phrase? This is the stripped-down sentence
I thought "having leave" is an participle phrase.
So I was wondering if "I was having leave" is idiomatic.
0
park sang joonSo I was wondering if "I was having leave" is idiomatic.
No, that isn't.
0
Thank you, Mr.Micawber, for your continuing support. Emotion: smile
Then, I was wondering why you think it is a stripped-down clause, not a pa
0
I was a such a fool. Emotion: sad
Now I think "but" connects the former clause with "I would rather have died upon~;" am I right?
0
park sang joonI was a such a fool. Now I think "but" connects the former clause with "I would rather have died upon~;" am I right?
Yes, and not a fool. The older style punctuation does not have the comma we expect nowadays after 'but'.

Related Questions