An one-side see through tank
They couldn't see her, because it was a one-side see through water tank. She could see them, but they could not see her.
Could you reword it? Doesn't seem to be correct.
Top answer
You can't just toss in a "one-side see-through water tank" as if they sell them on Amazon. OK, maybe they do, I don't know, but it's not a common enough thing. You have to describe and explain a little: "They couldn't see her, because the way the water tank was lit and situated, it acted like a one-way mirror.
- You can't just toss in a "one-side see-through water tank" as if they sell them on Amazon.
- OK, maybe they do, I don't know, but it's not a common enough thing.
- You have to describe and explain a little: "They couldn't see her, because the way the water tank was lit and situated, it acted like a one-way mirror.
- "
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
You can't just toss in a "one-side see-through water tank" as if they sell them on Amazon. OK, maybe they do, I don't know, but it's not a common enough thing. You have to describe and explain a little: "They couldn't see her, because the way the water tank was lit and situated, it acted like a one-way mirror. She could see them, but they could not see her."
0It doesn't matter if the type of glass is readily available to the general public, although it is.
The type of glass is called "one-way", not one-sided. You are redundant in stating that they could not see her twice.
The glass used in the water tank is one-way. She could them on the other side, but they couldn't see her.
0
Related Questions