0
AveCeasar Posted 8 years ago
Grammar

An issue with Past simple and past continuous

To me, it seems that you could use any of the sentences below and be happy about it:

1. I'm sorry, but I didn't understand what you said. You spoke too quietly.

2. I'm sorry, but I didn't understand what you were saying. You spoke too quietly.

3. I'm sorry, but I didn't understand what you said. You were speaking too quietly.

4. I'm sorry, but I didn't understand what you were saying. You were speaking too quietly.

Now, if I were a betting man, I would pick the third one. But it's really hard for me to explain why to use this one over the others. I would really appreciate it if you could enlighten me as to why it's correct (or incorrect).

I know that usually past continuous has an "anchor point" in the form of past simple or a defined moment in the past (e.g. 3 p.m.). But here there doesn't seem to be one. The verb "understand" forces us to use the simple tense and it doesn't seem to describe a specific moment, while "said" seems to describe the whole sentence uttered by someone.

  

Top answer

I'm sorry, but I see no significant difference among your 4 sentences.

  • I'm sorry, but I see no significant difference among your 4 sentences.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0

I'm sorry, but I see no significant difference among your 4 sentences.

0

Your question is about the "aspect". It's very difficult to say which one is correct because each sentence could be spoken by the speakers who could be in certain mood or preference. I think you need to try to understand the feeling of each sentence.

Related Questions