0
Anonymous Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

An if-clause there?

Hi. I think for the sentences below, we could think of as if-clauses being there, eventhough not explicitly. What do you think? If we could think of like that, is it common to have the modal verb "would" in subordinate clauses? (I am not sure I have written my questions correctly to reflect what I wanted to say, though.) I think the parts "he would do it" and "he would go for it" are subordinate clauses (not sure, though).

I think he would do it.

I think he would go for it.
  

Top answer

I think for the sentences we could think of as if-clauses being there, even though not explicitly. -- I agree. - - Yes.

  • I think for the sentences we could think of as if-clauses being there, even though not explicitly.
  • -- I agree.
  • - - Yes.
  • -- You have.
  • ) I think the parts "he would do it" and "he would go for it" are subordinate clauses (not sure, though).
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
I think for the sentences we could think of as if-clauses being there, even though not explicitly. What do you think?-- I agree.
If we could think of like that, is it common to have the modal verb "would" in subordinate clauses?-- Yes.
(I am not sure I have written my questions correctly to reflect what I wanted to say, though.-- You have.)
I think the parts "h
0
Here is another thread, MM has contributed to, which I think you'll find informative:



What I think MM is saying is that if would is not expressing repetition (past habits) or talking about the future in the past, then 'would' is being used as the conditional would, with either an

Related Questions