" I wouldn't call this "in a pposition" (I believe that is what you mean) since the word "of" links the two. park sang joon and that 'being' is omitted before the word 'alone'; am I right? "being" can be inserted leaving the meaning more or less the same.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
park sang joonI think the words "the situation" are in opposition with the phrase "so many men and one woman alone on a deserted island."I wouldn't call this "in apposition" (I believe that is what you mean) since the word "of" links the two.
park sang joonand that 'being' is omitted before the word 'alone'; am I right?
I wouldn't call this "in apposition" (I believe that is what you m
park sang joonis this really grammatical?Yes.
park sang joonI hope this usage is only in spoken English."so many men and one woman alone on a deserted island" is correct English in any situation.
park sang joonDo you think this usage is the like of ellipsis?No, not really.
I don't know the usage at all. I said I'd have liked to ask you one more thing, but if you don't mind I want to break my words. Do you think the thread about the structure "the more~ the more"?
No, not really.
park sang joonI don't know why the verb 'be' is always omitted in some textsAs I have said in other threads, psj ,the word 'omitted' suggests that the word was there originally. This is often not the case.
so many men and one woman alone on a deserted isla
park sang joonIs my example a participle phrase?I have lost count of the number of times you have asked this of a phrase and I have pointed out that a participle phrase must contain a participle.
So have I, but otherwise how can we explain the existence of the word 'alone' in my example?
I have lost count of the number of times you have asked this of a phrase.