Yes, I’d say it was an appositive construction. The two noun phrases what it was now and the signature scribble of madness seem to be in apposition, with the latter being a supplementary (non-restrictive) appositive to the former. The usual test for this kind of apposition is whether the appositive NP could stand alone in place of the whole construction.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
BillJThe two noun phrases what it was now and the signature scribble of madness seem to be in appositionIsn't it was now in apposition to what?
AnonymousIsn't it was now in apposition to what?No, I can't see that it is.
Anonymous BillJThe two noun phrases what it was now and the signature scribble of madness seem to be in apposition. Isn't it was now in apposition to what?No. In the NP "what it was now", the fused relative word "what" functions simultaneously as head of the NP and as predicative complement.
BillJNo. In the NP "what it was now", the fused relative word "what" functions simultaneously as head of the NP and as predicative complement.Think of it as "That which it was now __", where gap represents the PC.I understand that a finite clause introduced by that and postmodifying a noun phrase is an appositive clause. I take it like that: what it