Hello, again. Thank you for answering my last question. I've read them, and it made sense to me that the sentence is likely to be lexically/ progmatically ambiguous.
And.... I have another question. My book has full of questions and examples but no explanation, so I have to ask you guys here. ?_?
1. John left a DIRECTION for Mary to follow. 2. John left a direction for Mary to FOLLOW (Caplitalized words mean that they are stressed when they are pronounced, )
Now, my book says that those two sentences are semantically and structurally different.
I think sentence 1 means that John left a note or guidance so that Mary can follow it. But I don't know about sentence 2.
Could you help me one more time?
Thank you again!!!
Top answer
Hi, 1. John left a DIRECTION for Mary to follow. 2.
— Clive
Hi, 1.
John left a DIRECTION for Mary to follow.
2.
John left a direction for Mary to FOLLOW (Caplitalized words mean that they are stressed when they are pronounced, ) Now, my book says that those two sentences are semantically and structurally different.
I think sentence 1 means that John left a note or guidance so that Mary can follow it.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1. John left a DIRECTION for Mary to follow. 2. John left a direction for Mary to FOLLOW (Caplitalized words mean that they are stressed when they are pronounced, )
Now, my book says that those two sentences are semantically and structurally different.
I think sentence 1 means that John left a note or guidance so t