0Hello all,02br 00I hope that someone can help me, a german for whom English is only a foreign language, with the following problem:02br 00Does "let the first one to speak be our leader" mean that (i) the person who is currently our leader shall speak first, or that (ii) the first person who will speak will become our new leader? 02br 00To put it more formally: When I have two references "x" and "y", does "let x be y" mean that from here on, "x" shall refer to what is already known as "y", or that from here on, "y" shall refer to what is currently known as "x"?02br 00Thank you very much, 02br 00Jobst 0-
Top answer
0It could be either one. 02br 02br 00Shhh! It's not your place to start the discussion.
— BarbaraPA
0It could be either one.
02br 02br 00Shhh!
It's not your place to start the discussion.
Let the first one to speak be our leader.
02br 02br 00No one wants to take charge.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0It could be either one. Context will tell you.02br 02br 00Shhh! It's not your place to start the discussion. Let the first one to speak be our leader. - Clearly, that's your i.02br 02br 00No one wants to take charge. No one knows how to get us out of this mess. I tell you what. Let the first one to speak be our leader, and we will follow that person's lea
0Thank you for this remark. I feared it may depend on context but hoped there would be only one "official" way to use "let". 02br 00So, if the construction with "let" is indeed ambiguous, is there an easy way to say such things more clearly in order to avoid confusion?02br 00Perhaps using "become"?0-
0The sentence, though perfectly good English, strikes me as slightly unnatural. It is almost as if it has been constructed to throw up the ambiguity.02br 02br 00 More natural would be:02br 02br 01i00Let the leader speak first02i00 or 01i00The leader should speak first02i02br 02br 01i00 Whoeve