A. "A business deal with Michael would be beneficial to Peter."
B. "Peter agreed on a business deal with Michael."
The correctness of A leads to some confusion about B. From A, I could see that "a business deal with Michael" is a valid noun phrase, where "with Michael" modifies "a business deal".
In B, does "with Michael" modifies "business deal" or "agreed"? B has two slightly different intepretations:
B1. Peter and Michael agreed on (signed) a business deal.
B2. A business deal that involved Michael was agreed on (signed) by Peter.
What should I do?
Top answer
Hi, A. " B. " The correctness of A leads to some confusion about B.
— Clive
Hi, A.
" B.
" The correctness of A leads to some confusion about B.
From A, I could see that "a business deal with Michael" is a valid noun phrase, where "with Michael" modifies "a business deal".
In B, does "with Michael" modifies "business deal" or "agreed"?
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
A. "A business deal with Michael would be beneficial to Peter."
B. "Peter agreed on a business deal with Michael."
The correctness of A leads to some confusion about B. From A, I could see that "a business deal with Michael" is a valid noun phrase, where "with Michael" modifies "a business deal".
The "X agreed on/to a deal/contract with Y" pattern seems to be common:
"In May, the United States announced that it was rewriting its trade rules to remove gambling services from the jurisdiction of the WTO. Washington has already agreed on deals with the European Union, Canada and Japan to change the treaty but it has yet to reach agreements wi