0
Anonymous Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

adv+adv+adj

"If I didn't have the speed demon subtitle reading eyes of an age old weeb, I might not have been able to follow the 'stupidly ridiculously fast-paced' dialogue and convoluted mess of a story that was crammed into this 20 minute episode."

It's a review that I read. Is it right to be interpreted as the following : 'fast-paced' is modified by the 'ridiculously,' and the 'ridiculously fast-paced' ismodified by the 'stupidly.'
  

Top answer

This is informal phrasing that is open to grouping in different ways. As well as yours, "stupidly" might modify "ridiculously" and then "stupidly ridiculously" modify "fast-paced", or "stupidly" and "ridiculously" might individually and separately modify "dialogue". All interpretations have essentially the same meaning for the purposes of the text, so it does not matter which is adopted.

  • This is informal phrasing that is open to grouping in different ways.
  • As well as yours, "stupidly" might modify "ridiculously" and then "stupidly ridiculously" modify "fast-paced", or "stupidly" and "ridiculously" might individually and separately modify "dialogue".
  • All interpretations have essentially the same meaning for the purposes of the text, so it does not matter which is adopted.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
This is informal phrasing that is open to grouping in different ways. As well as yours, "stupidly" might modify "ridiculously" and then "stupidly ridiculously" modify "fast-paced", or "stupidly" and "ridiculously" might individually and separately modify "dialogue". All interpretations have essentially the same meaning for the purposes of the text, so it does not matter which is adopted.

Related Questions