I see your problem. I knew instinctively after only five words that it modifies the verb, but I don't know if I can explain it. At first, I thought it was the sentence order which made the difference.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
RaenThe book on the table in the English classroom is her book.I've been threatening to buy an ESL text, but haven't gotten around to it.
The pirate map was hidden underneath a big rock.
The dog is troublesome in so many ways.
In the cage we saw a juaguar from the jungle of Brazil.
Raen"We saw the jaguar in the cage from the jungle of Brazil."
would you still say "in thejunglecage " modifies the verb "saw"? Or would it change since it comes right after the noun "jaguar"? This is exactly the point I was trying to make about the limitation of the rules. They're useful only in eliminating the adjectival
AvangiThis is exactly the point I was trying to make about the limitation of the rules. They're useful only in eliminating the adjectival function, not in asserting it. An adverbial / prepositional phrase, according to the two rules, may be placed anywhere, including directly after a noun which it does not modify. That i
AnonymousThe easiest way to explain is this: Adverbs and Adverbs phrases tell where, when, how, and how much (to what extent). In the cage tells where, therefore is Adverb.Perhaps it's the easiest, but it may not be the most reliable. You must still consider the context to determine that "in the cage" doesn't indicate which jaguar,