Why is this infinitive phrase adjectival?
“The student lacked the energy - to continue the exam.”
But is this other one adverbial?
“You will need a pen - to write with.”
Thank you!
, being taught. I suspect that whatever book you are reading on this topic considers "to continue the exam" as a kind of energy, strange as that may seem. This leads them to say that the infinitive construction modifies 'energy'.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Often the classification of such constructions depends on the analytical methodology you are using, i.e., being taught.
I suspect that whatever book you are reading on this topic considers "to continue the exam" as a kind of energy, strange as that may seem. This leads them to say that the infinitive construction modifies 'energy'. On the other hand, your book probably treats "to write
I agree with CJ - you will find classification rather arbitrary.
Can you remove the phrase and still leave the sentence intact?
1. The student lacked the energy. I would answer, No. The sentence has lost an essential element.
2. You will need a pen. Yes. The phrase is non-essential, so it is an adjunct. (Adverbial.)
piermoWhy is this infinitive phrase adjectival?
“The student lacked the energy - to continue the exam.”
It's not adjectival. Its function is that of complement of the noun "energy". It's a complement because it is licensed (specifically required or permitted) by the noun "energy".
piermoBut is this other