Hi Everyone,
This is the last sentence I'll cut and paste in reference to my issue about fragmented sentences that show double subjects. I think the following sentence definitely should remove the pronoun - they - referring to the Kim's family members. Here is the sentence I just found online:
'There’s no space for the Kim clan in a unified Korea, his brother, cousin, aunts and uncles, they are inseparably connected with the regime and will be prosecuted as criminals.'
I think the sentence makes perfect sense if we remove 'they' from the sentence. In fact it's THIS type of example that I see often; almost every time I read a lengthy article online.
I hope everyone is having a nice weekend. ![]()
CC
Cup cake I think the sentence makes perfect sense if we remove 'they' from the sentence No, it doesn't, if you are looking for perfect grammar. " Cup cake In fact it's THIS type of example that I see often; almost every time I read a lengthy article online. That's because it is a common informal style which could benefit from better punctuation.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Cup cakeI think the sentence makes perfect sense if we remove 'they' from the sentence
No, it doesn't, if you are looking for perfect grammar.
What do you propose to do about this?— "...Korea, his brother..."
Cup cake In fact it's THIS type of example that I see often; almost every time I read a lengthy article onli
Cup cake'There’s no space for the Kim clan in a unified Korea, his brother, cousin, aunts and uncles, they are inseparably connected with the regime and will be prosecuted as criminals.'
The error is that the sentence is a run-on sentence, with a comma placed at the end of the sentence instead of a period or semicolon. Removing "they" makes the grammar even