I can't understand this part of the sentence below, and get puzzled with this. Could anyone here help me to get a rephrase version and an alternative of it?
"The variety of viewpoints precisely reflects his inclusive approach, transcending the many important scholars and viewpoints that he analyzes. Add to this the depth of empirically relevant knowledge and analytic capability, and we are presented with a set of considerations of justice of importance to both the academic community and the world of policy formation."
1. The variety of viewpoints precisely reflects his inclusive approach, transcending the many important scholars and viewpoints that he analyzes. 2.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1. The variety of viewpoints precisely reflects his inclusive approach, transcending the many important scholars and viewpoints that he analyzes.
2. The thing being described demonstrates deep empirically relevant knowledge and analytic capability.
When (2) is added to (1), i.e. when these two factors are considered together, the result is that "we are presented with a set of consi