0
Messier42 Posted 13 years ago
Vocabulary

About "would"

It is unthinable that he" would" use the foul language to CEO.
It is unthinkable that he use the foul language to CEO.

In the 70s it "would’ve been" unthinkable for a woman to smoke in the street.
In the 70s it was unthinkable for a woman to smoke in the street.

What's the difference between the sentences which have "would" and have not?
  

Top answer

It is unthinkable that he would use foul language with the CEO. It is unthinkable that he use foul language with the C EO. #2 seems wrong or antiquated to me.

  • It is unthinkable that he would use foul language with the CEO.
  • It is unthinkable that he use foul language with the C EO.
  • #2 seems wrong or antiquated to me.
  • In the 70s, it would’ve been unthinkable for a woman to smoke in the street.
  • -- Maybe they didn't smoke in the street then.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
It is unthinkable that he would use foul language with the CEO.
It is unthinkable that he use foul language with the CEO.

#2 seems wrong or antiquated to me.

In the 70s, it would’ve been unthinkable for a woman to smoke in the street.-- Maybe they didn't smoke in the street then.
In the 70s, it was unthinkable for a woman to smoke in
0
It is unthinkable that he would use foul language with the CEO.
It is unthinkable that he use foul language with the CEO.

Fot these two sentences, how are they different?

Thank you!!
0
messier42For these two sentences, how are they different?
As I have already said, the 2nd sounds antiquated.
0
Do you mean that it is old-fashioned?

Related Questions