About climate change...

Question

Nowadays climate change is a great global problem and this problem affecting all people in the world. It is already happening and represents one of the greatest environmental, social and economic threats facing the planet. According this affect the question arises as how we can deal this problem. There are many ideas around this topic, but the core idea which formed is each of us should be do something to stop global climate changing. On the other hand majority of people think it is not theirs duty and they want government must prevent it. The people which belong this category sees the problem as a reason of waste pollution from plant, factories. We can find also those who say that the damage is committed by government. Of course today with the development of science and technology the pollution mainly increased than past years. But to blame government and make only it responsibly for the current problem will be erroneous. We invidually are more harmful to the environment than government. People simply are not aware of the damage which they make by their selves. The action day by day which people committed collects and finally makes a great, global problem. I do not agree with the opinion. Significantly more correct will be if government and people unite and fight against to the current issue. The climate is a very important thing and if we don’t stop the changes soon, more and more plants and trees are going to die. I think it is better to first stop the changes in climate and then gradually increase the healthy life. Because if we stop the changes, we are going to be healthier and everything around us will be cleaner and it will be how it actually should be. I believe harmony between nature and human beings will return.

305 words

AlpheccaStars · Accepted Answer

What happened with your previous essay -- the one on "home energy production"? I have highlighted some areas that need your attention:

Nowadays climate change is a great global problem and this problem affecting all people in the world. It is already happening and represents one of the greatest environmental, social and economic threats facing the planet. According this affect the question arises as how we can deal with this problem. There are many ideas around this topic, but the core idea which formed is each of us should be do something to stop global climate changing. On the other hand, the majority of people think it is not theirs duty and they want government must prevent it. The people which belong to this category sees the problem as a reason of waste pollution from plant, factories. We can find also those who say that the damage is committed by the government. Of course today with the development of science and technology the pollution mainly increased than past years. But to blame government and make only it responsibly for the current problem will be erroneous. We invidually are more harmful to the environment than the government. People simply are not aware of the damage which they make by their selves. The action day by day which people committed collects and finally makes a great, global problem. I do not agree with the opinion. Significantly more correct will be if government and people unite and fight against to the current issue. The climate is a very important thing and if we don’t stop the changes soon, more and more plants and trees are going to die. I think it is better to first stop the changes in climate and then gradually increase the healthy life. Because if we stop the changes, we are going to be healthier and everything around us will be cleaner and it will be how it actually should be. I believe harmony between nature and human beings will return.

Gunelstudent · Answer

I will post the new one after writing. (about first essay )

Gunelstudent · Answer

Nowadays climate change is a great global problem and this problem affecting all people in the world. It is already happening and represents one of the greatest environmental, social and economic threats facing the planet. According this affect the question arises as how we can deal this problem. There are many ideas around this topic, but the core idea which formed is each of us should be do something to stop global climate changing. On the other hand majority of people think it is not theirs duty and they want government must prevent it. The people which belong this category sees the problem as a reason of waste pollution from plant, factories. We can find also those who say that the damage is committed by government. Of course today with the development of science and technology the pollution mainly increased than past years. But to blame government and make only it responsibly for the current problem will be erroneous. We invidually are more harmful to the environment than government. People simply are not aware of the damage which they make by their selves. The action day by day which people committed collects and finally makes a great, global problem. I do not agree with the opinion. Significantly more correct will be if government and people unite and fight against to the current issue. The climate is a very important thing and if we don’t stop the changes soon, more and more plants and trees are going to die. I think it is better to first stop the changes in climate and then gradually increase the healthy life. Because if we stop the changes, we are going to be healthier and everything around us will be cleaner and it will be how it actually should be. I believe harmony between nature and human beings will return.

305 words

AlpheccaStars · Answer

Nowadays climate change is a great global problem and this problem affecting all people in the world. It is already happening and represents one of the greatest environmental, social and economic threats facing the planet. According this affect the question arises as how we can deal this problem. There are many ideas around this topic, but the core idea which formed is each of us should be do something to stop global climate changing. On the other hand majority of people think it is not theirs duty and they want government must prevent it. The people which belong this category sees the problem as a reason of waste pollution from plant, factories. We can find also those who say that the damage is committed by government. Of course today with the development of science and technology the pollution mainly increased than past years. But to blame government and make only it responsibly for the current problem will be erroneous. We invidually are more harmful to the environment than government. People simply are not aware of the damage which they make by their selves. The action day by day which people committed collects and finally makes a great, global problem. I do not agree with the opinion. Significantly more correct will be if government and people unite and fight against to the current issue. The climate is a very important thing and if we don’t stop the changes soon, more and more plants and trees are going to die. I think it is better to first stop the changes in climate and then gradually increase the healthy life. Because if we stop the changes, we are going to be healthier and everything around us will be cleaner and it will be how it actually should be. I believe harmony between nature and human beings will return.

305 words

Gunelstudent · Answer

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a
foreign language at primary school rather that secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?

Nowadays this question is very relevant and according this different opinions with regard to the question of whether children should learn foreign languages since primary school or not. Some researchers believe that students should start to study languages as early as possible. But also some people disagree with this verdict. In my point of view, advantages of early learning of languages outweigh the disadvantages. Let’s do analysis this question more deeply.
Principal occasion why more important to start teach children to other languages is the best memory which they have at early ages. Children at this age able to memorize more than elder students. They easily can remember difficult phrases, grammars and a lot of new words. I can say confidently I agree with the researchers because, I did observation to this theme. I have a little brother which 12 years old. I teach him English and Russian since 5 years. When he was a child I saw he memorizes the difficult English words from the cartoons. Then he used to with the speaking. As a matter of fact the children at this age also curios than secondary school children. This curiosity helps him to learn heavy words and more languages at this age.
But on the other hand in reality have some decline moments. In a fact nothing always able for everyone. For example, some children not able to remember more. Children will be put under extra pressure, if they take up learning a new language at early age. Therefore, this can leave a negative effect on them. Accordingly this fact we can’t apply this theory for everyone.
Above all, I completely agree that learning a foreign language at primary school is very important because children manage with new information better. However, at the same time, students at secondary school do not have enough time for learning languages. Learning a foreign language since primary school can bring a lot of benefits for students, providing that lessons are introduced in an attractive and enjoyable form. In all respects, in my point of view, the benefits outweigh the demerits.

348 words

AlpheccaStars · Answer

Nowadays (Please try to avoid "nowadays." It is an informal expression.) this question is very relevant and according this different opinions with regard to the question of whether children should learn foreign languages since primary school or not. Some researchers believe that students should start to study languages as early as possible. But also some people disagree with this verdict. (A verdict is a ruling in a court of law. The verdict was "guilty.") In my point of view, the advantages of early learning of languages outweigh the disadvantages. Let’s do analysis this question more deeply.
Principal occasion (An occasion is an event that happens at a particular time.) why more important to start teach children to other languages is the best memory which they have at early ages. Children at this age able to memorize more than elder students. They easily can remember difficult phrases, grammars and a lot of new words. I can say confidently I agree with the researchers because, I did observation to this theme. I have a little brother which 12 years old. I teach him English and Russian since 5 years. When he was a child I saw he memorizes the difficult English words from the cartoons. Then he used to with the speaking. As a matter of fact the children at this age also curios than secondary school children. This curiosity helps him to learn heavy words and more languages at this age.
But on the other hand in reality (?) have some decline moments. In a fact nothing always able for everyone. For example, some children not able to remember more. Children will be put under extra pressure, if they take up learning a new language at an early age. Therefore, this can leave a negative effect on them. Accordingly this fact we can’t apply this theory to ~~for~~ everyone.
Above all, I completely agree that learning a foreign language at in primary school is very important because children manage with new information better. However, at the same time, students at secondary school do not have enough time for learning languages. Learning a foreign language since primary school can bring a lot of benefits for students, providing that lessons are introduced in an attractive and enjoyable form. In all respects, in my point of view, the benefits outweigh the demerits.

Note: You sometimes leave out required verbs.

Gunelstudent · Answer

In our generation this question is very relevant andaccording this different opinions with regard to the question of whether children should learn foreign languages since primary school or not. Some researchers believe that students should start to study languages as early as possible. But also some people disagree with this theory. In my point of view, the advantages of early learning of languages outweigh the disadvantages. Let’s analyze this question more deeply.
Principal cause why more important to startteach children to other languages is the best memory which they have at early ages. Children at this age can memorize more than elder students. They easily can remember difficult phrases, grammars and a lot of new words. I can say confidently I agree with the researchers because, I did observation to this concepts. I have a little brother which 12 years old. I teach him English and Russian when he has been 5 years old. When he was a child I saw he keep in mind the difficult English words from the cartoons. Then he is used in speech. As a matter of fact the children at this age also curios than secondary school children. This curiosity helps him to learn heavy words and more languages at this age.
But on the other hand in reality (?) have some decline moments. In a fact nothing always able for everyone. For example, some children not able to remember more. Children will be put under extra pressure, if they take up learning a new language at an early age. Therefore, this can leave a negative effect on them. Accordingly this fact we can’t apply this theory to ~~for~~ everyone.
Above all, I completely agree that learning a foreign language at in primary school is very important because children manage with new information better. However, at the same time, students at secondary school do not have enough time for learning languages. Learning a foreign language since primary school can bring a lot of benefits for students, providing that lessons are introduced in an attractive and enjoyable form. In all respects, in my point of view, the benefits outweigh the demerits.

About climate change...

Top answer

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

Related Questions