About [believe in]

Question

Hi,I am in need of a certain knowledge about the defination of the [in].I have the understanding with it and could any native speaker tell me correct or not?In {I believe in God.}, I do believe that activity is surrounded or contained by God. Because I vary according to Him and I am supported by Him. So, any one or thing which is trusted by us, it must be the one or thing which is able to be the thing to have us do trust. The thing / one is trusted by us that is a dependable thing. Thank you for your assistance.

AlpheccaStars · Accepted Answer

Hi;

I believe in *** = I believe that *** exists.

This statement does not say anything about the nature of *** or the relationship between you and ***, such as trust, support, confidence, or the nature of *** such as dependability, gender, activity, etc..

The opposite is:
I do not believe in *** = I believe that *** does not exist.

Bepleased · Answer

Hi, Thanks a lot .Yes, but there are two problems in your teaching :1. accordinng to the scripture(Doctrine &covenants 50:34), the perfect of belief made of :A. receive ***;   B. let him account  it of ***;    C. let him rejoice that he is accounted of *** worthy to receive;So, the key words of belief are : [receive ***(----you are on willing an acceptor) ]  / [*** is for making your deserving to receive].according to the scripture ALMA 32:27, your believing in *** that is the work of *** That is in His words."But behold, if ye will awake and arouse your faculties, even to an experiment upon my words, and exercise a particle of faith, ya, even if ye can no more than desire to believe, let this desire work in you, even until ye believe in a manner that ye can give place for a partion of my words."

Bepleased · Answer

Hi AlpheccaStars,And 2. according to the defination of the [depend on] and the [dependable], the [to depend] / [to depend on] = to vary according to / be decided by and to be supported by ; the [dependable] = able to be trusted; So, whenever you vary according to someone / something or you are supported by someone / something, all those are the particular situation to make you do the acitivity of [trusting someone / something].So, you do trust that is the result of his being the man that is able to be the person who can have you do trust. We perhaps come to the conclusion that no dependence, no trust.

AlpheccaStars · Answer

Hi;
I am not teaching anything. I am just giving you a paraphrase of the sentence.

The statement "I believe in ***." could be from any monotheistic religion, past or present.
It is not exclusive to Christianity and its associated belief systems. You are adding a lot of your own religious context to this statement, when it, in itself, implies none of it.

Bepleased · Answer

Hi,If you see why is my confusion Alphecca Stars, trying to see the following explanation.In [We trust the remedy] / [the dependable remedy], though [the remedy] is considered to be the object of transitive verb, yet still I have a strong reason for regarding [the remedy] as a compelling thing to cause the subject of [we] to do the action of trusting.If you see why is the reason? Trying to see why the definition of [dependable] in this way ----"able to be trusted".The definition shows that the thing to be trusted is the thing to dominate the subject to trust. If work [the remedy] into the definition that effect would be very clear to see. [the dependable remedy]----the remedy is able to be a dominator to compel us to trust. So we come to the conclusion that no the remedy , no our trust.------and the trusted remedy that acts what we vary according to or what we are decided by and what supports us or what we are supported by ;Thank you for your assistance.

Raindoctor · Answer

There is a difference between "believe that" and "believe in". To explain the difference, lets look at Good word.

Even though, in the classical but simple interpretation, the Devil himself is a fallen angel, he does not believe *in *** *, but merely acknowledges His existence. As the Gospel puts it, “Thou believest that there is one ***; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble” (James 2: 26; my emphasis.) "

AlpheccaStars · Answer

Are you asking about the words "trust" and "dependable"?

I trust my car.
I am saying that my car is dependable.
It never breaks down, and I can rely on it.
It has earned my trust, but it has not forced (compelled) me to trust it. That is my free choice to do so.

So, yes, there is a relationship between my attitude (trusting) and the object (the car) having earned that relationship.
But that relationship might be fleeting. It might fail tomorrow, and then I will no longer trust it.

Bepleased · Answer

Hi,Yes, my problem is to confirm the logic position of [the action of to trust] or the course of it.To your saying, I know "You trust your car" to be a reaction to / in its good, usable, and sturdy conditio.Your attitude (trusting) not happens to grow up. Dependence is given to the car that means the car has you vary according to it and you are supported by it.All of dependence  based on its own ability not in your a bright heart  suddenly dropped down out of the sky.

Bepleased · Answer

Hi,The prototype of language----{to be able to be trusted} shows that somene / something it describes has the power to casue you or earn you to do an attitude of trust. Why is English great?Because its daily language implanted into the gene of logic and philosophy unto the well uninitiated users. Given by *** is the best explanation.

About [believe in]

Top answer

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

Related Questions