0
Seoul Brother Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

about be supposed to V

It is not supposed to buy to get a free gift.
You will not be supposed to buy to get a free gift.

Both of them are grammatically correct?
If incorrect, why?

thanks in advance
  

Top answer

No, they're not correct. , Students are supposed to be polite in class. In some cultures, children are not supposed to eat before their parents.

— Teechr

  • No, they're not correct.
  • , Students are supposed to be polite in class.
  • In some cultures, children are not supposed to eat before their parents.
  • As a teacher, I'm supposed to encourage students to think analytically.
  • You were supposed to return that book to the library last month!
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
No, they're not correct.
"supposed to" = "expected to"
e.g.,
Students are supposed to be polite in class.
In some cultures, children are not supposed to eat before their parents.
As a teacher, I'm supposed to encourage students to think analytically.
You were supposed to return that book to the library last month!
0
0
Seoul Brother Both of them are grammatically correct?
Are both of them grammatically correct?
Note the correct way to ask your question.

'It is not necessary to buy/make a purchase to get a free gift.'

'You will not be required/obliged/expected to buy something to
0

Related Questions