0
Anonymous Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

Ability of modal 'could' to denote abillity

Hi,
I think it is wrong to say we can use the modal "could" to denote ability although the modal "can" be used as such like in "We can play soccer well. I think it is correct to say we can use "would" to denote past ability like in "He endured so he could play soccer with us."
  

Top answer

" This is essentially incomprehensible. You are talking about giving an example with would , and then you give an example that does not contain would . CJ

  • " This is essentially incomprehensible.
  • You are talking about giving an example with would , and then you give an example that does not contain would .
  • CJ
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
AnonymousI think it is correct to say we can use "would" to denote past ability like as in "He endured so he could play soccer with us."
This is essentially incomprehensible. You are talking about giving an exam
0
Sorry, let me rewrite it, reflecting your corrections and putting a quotation mark in one, so that it may be clear.

Hi,
I think it is wrong to say javascript:void(0) use the modal "could" to denote ability although the modal "can" be used as such as in "We can javascript:void(0) well." I think it is correct to say we can
0
AnonymousI think it is wrong to say we can use the modal "could" to denote ability
Why do you think it is wrong? Naturally, you need something in the context to cue the reader to the past, but other than that, could certainly is used to denote ability in the past.
When Jack was ten years younger, he could li
0
Wow. wow. With that responses, you got two "wow's" from me. It is very detailed, I might say, but I need more time to digest. Thank you.
0
Thanks. Two wows are better than one, but one would have been sufficient! Emotion: wink

CJ

Related Questions